KontorBund — Explainer
Where registration can be delegated — and where it can'tLast checked 8 September 2026
kontorbund.com/explainers/where-registration-can-be-delegated.html
Where registration can be delegated — and where it can't
The short version
Article 44 has two delegation routes, not one, and they default
opposite ways. Your scheme may register you unless a member state says otherwise
(Art. 44(2)); your representative may register you only if a member
state says so (Art. 44(3)). Germany is the one state we have found that shut
both. Austria went the other way and made the representative the only route you are
allowed to use. And eleven of the twenty-seven have published no answer at all.
There are two delegation routes, not one
Almost every guide to this subject asks one question — "does this country let
my representative register me?" — and treats the answer as a single national
switch. That is the wrong shape. Article 44 contains two
separate delegation routes, they run through different people, and their
defaults point in opposite directions.
- Route one — the PRO route,
Art. 44(2) - Second sentence: where you have entrusted a producer responsibility organisation with your EPR obligations under
Art. 46(1), "the obligations set out in this Article shall be met by that organisation, unless otherwise specified by the Member State". Note the shape: this is on by default, and a state has to actively switch it off. - Route two — the representative route,
Art. 44(3) - "Member States may provide that the obligations set out in this Article may, on the basis of a written mandate, be met on behalf of producers by an authorised representative for the extended producer responsibility." Off by default, and a state has to actively switch it on.
Germany closed both doors — and that is the unusual part
Germany is the country everyone quotes, and it is quoted for the wrong reason. People say "Germany doesn't allow delegation" as though it were a strict version of a rule the others have relaxed. What actually happened is more specific: Germany is the one member state we have found that has shut both routes.
It did not take the Art. 44(3) option, so no representative may register
you. And it is the "unless otherwise specified by the Member State" in
Art. 44(2) — your dual system may do a great deal for you, but it may not
submit your LUCID registration. The ZSVR's own word for it is
höchstpersönlich: strictly personal. Your own employees may do the typing. An
external service, agency or representative may not.
Austria is the mirror image, and it surprises people more
If Germany closed both doors, Austria removed the handle from the inside. A seller with no Austrian seat or branch, shipping to Austrian consumers, is not allowed to register alone. The representative is not a convenience there and not a way of saving yourself an afternoon — it is the only route into the system that exists.
Sellers find this the harder of the two to accept, because it costs money to do something they were willing to do for free. It is worth being precise about what is happening: Austria has not made registration optional, it has made you ineligible to perform it. The obligation is unchanged; the hand that performs it is not yours.
All twenty-seven, as far as we can establish
Read this as "who, in practice, submits the registration" rather than as a ruling on which paragraph a state relied on — several countries have a working route without ever having published which of the two doors they opened. Not published means exactly that: we looked, we did not find it, and we would rather leave a gap than fill it.
| Country | Who submits your registration | What we found |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | Your representative — and only them | A seller with no Austrian seat may not register for consumer sales at all. Notarially certified power of attorney. |
| Belgium | Your scheme | Fost Plus registers its members collectively. Your representative must itself be registered with EPRiBEL. |
| Bulgaria | Not published | Filing runs on a qualified electronic signature and no foreign-producer route has been published either way. |
| Croatia | Your representative | The representative uploads the authorisation into RPPO for the Fund to approve. |
| Cyprus | Not published | Cyprus has not published which register entry a foreign producer needs, let alone who may make it. |
| Czechia | Your representative | A dedicated application exists, and the representative may file in its own name. |
| Denmark | Your representative | The representative files — and DPA invoices it, not you. Seven days to accept before the request expires. |
| Estonia | Your representative | In substance yes: the appointment is not complete until the mandate is filed in the packaging register. |
| Finland | Your scheme | The producer organisation contracted through Rinki handles the authority registration. |
| France | Your mandataire or scheme | The scheme registers you in SYDEREP and ADEME issues the IDU. The exact mirror of Germany. |
| Germany | You, personally | Neither route. höchstpersönlich — your own staff may type it, no external party may. |
| Greece | Not published | EMPA exists and is in Greek; no appointment procedure for a representative has been published. |
| Hungary | Your representative | Under Decree 80/2023, with a Hungarian tax number. Two registrations, authority and MOHU. |
| Ireland | Not published | Competent authorities designated in 2025; the operational route was not published when we checked. |
| Italy | Not published | The PPWR register is unpublished. The CONAI foreign-company route is an email address. |
| Latvia | Not published | No published position on either route for a producer established abroad. |
| Lithuania | Not published | GPAIS is built around Lithuanian producer and importer definitions. No complete foreign route. |
| Luxembourg | Not published | Valorlux is the practical route; the register question itself is open. |
| Malta | Your representative | Malta already publishes a written-mandate form — rarer than it should be. |
| Netherlands | Not published | No published position, though below 50,000 kg there may be nothing to file anyway. |
| Poland | Not published — and in practice, you | No published position, and BDO access normally needs a person who can authenticate through Poland's national system. A BDO proxy is not an Art. 45(3) representative. |
| Portugal | Your representative | The authorised-representative classification in SILiAmb is the entry route for a foreign tax number. |
| Romania | Not published | No single public packaging register; AFM enrolment needs a qualified electronic signature. |
| Slovakia | Your representative | The § 27 mandate has a statutory minimum one-year term, and the representative acts in its own name. |
| Slovenia | Your representative | The representative completes the registration — this is how the well-run ones work. |
| Spain | Your representative | The representative registers you in the RPP; your ENV number then goes on your invoices. |
| Sweden | Your PRO | The PRO may submit, and you remain accountable for the accuracy and the timing either way. |
Eleven of the twenty-seven have no published answer. That is the real headline,
and it is not a gap in this page — it is a gap in the national implementations, eight
months after the register obligation started to bite. Where the route is unpublished the
duty is not suspended; you still may not make packaging available before you are
registered (Art. 44(4)), which is an uncomfortable place for a state to leave
a seller standing.
Why this is worth getting right
Three practical consequences, in the order they tend to bite.
- You may be buying something you cannot use
- A provider selling "EU-wide registration handled for you" is selling something that is not deliverable in Germany and not clearly deliverable in the eleven unpublished states. Ask, per country, who signs the application. A provider that answers "we handle it" without naming the route has not answered.
- It changes what you can and cannot outsource under time pressure
- If you find a deadline three days out, the delegable countries are the ones you can still fix by signing a mandate. Germany is not — you have to be at the keyboard yourself, and you need whatever identity credentials the register wants. Plan the non-delegable ones first.
- Registration and representation are different things and get conflated
- A country can require a representative and still refuse to let that representative register you. Germany does exactly that. So "I have appointed a representative" is not the same sentence as "I am registered", and only one of them keeps you the right side of
Art. 44(4). See what an authorised representative is — and isn't.
Sources
The two-route reading is ours, taken from the text of Art. 44 itself. We
have not seen it set out this way in a vendor guide or in the Commission FAQ, which is
either because it is obvious once you read the Article or because everyone has been
answering the folkloric question instead. Check it against the text before you rely on
it — the relevant words are quoted in full above, so you can.
-
Regulation (EU) 2025/40 (PPWR) — EUR-Lex Source for
Art. 44(2)second sentence (the PRO route, on unless a state specifies otherwise),Art. 44(3)(the representative route, off unless a state provides for it),Art. 44(4)(no making available before registration) andArt. 46(1)(entrusting a PRO). Read directly for this page -
ZSVR — the German register on the authorised representative Source for German registration being
höchstpersönlichand for the representative duty existing alongside it rather than instead of it -
European Commission — PPWR Frequently Asked Questions, 2nd edition DG ENV Unit B01, August 2026 (KH-01-26-068-EN-N). Read in full. Does not address the Art. 44(2) / Art. 44(3) distinction — checked, so nobody repeats the search
-
The twenty-seven country desks Every row in the table above is drawn from that country's desk, where the finding sits next to its national source
Help us finish this page
Eleven countries have no published answer — Bulgaria, Cyprus, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and Romania. If you have registered in any of them, you know something the published material does not say: who actually signed the application, and whether the authority accepted it from them. That is a two-line contribution that closes a row on this table for everybody.